It's
no surprise, half a century into the mass-media age, that Presidents and
politicians usually don't write their own speeches. If a candidate can use a
TelePrompTer to read a speech and hire a make-up artist to make him look good,
doing it, why not hire a professional wordsmith to put the words together in
the first place? Yet even today, there is a certain primal expectation that the
words a leader uses should come from his own heart and mind, that they should
express him. The Gettysburg Address is sacred in part because Abraham Lincoln
wrote it; if it were discovered tomorrow that he had paid someone to write it
for him, we would feel betrayed. Yet the most famous speeches of, say, Ronald
Reagan—his call to "Mr. Gorbachev" to tear down the Berlin Wall, his
D-Day eulogy for the "boys of Pointe du Hoc"—are well known to be the
work of speechwriters like Peggy Noonan. Do those speeches reflect credit on
Reagan, or on Noonan, or both—or neither?
Dennis Glover is well
equipped to wrestle with such questions in The
Art of Great Speeches: And Why We Remember Them. As a speechwriter for Australian politicians,
including the current Prime Minister Julia Gillard, he knows that speeches are
something in between heartfelt self-expression and mere work-for-hire. It is a
rule, Glover notes, that "a true speechwriter never writes for the
political opposition": unlike pollsters, who can work for any candidate, a
speechwriter is expected to have convictions, to serve a cause rather than a
client. And Glover strongly believes that the speechwriter plays an important
role in making democracy work. Politicians' failure to communicate effectively,
he writes, "rob[s] our democracy of energy, and the cost is paid in the
wreckage of governments and political movements unable to enthuse their
followers or provide an adequate riposte to their opponents."
In his book, Glover weaves
a history of oratory together with a defense of it, while offering many
practical tips along the way. Starting with ancient Greece, he shows how
oratory has always been both an important tool in public life and a source of
suspicion. The Greeks developed an elaborate vocabulary of rhetorical
techniques, which Glover uses to analyze a number of famous speeches, down to
the present day. Barack Obama's acceptance speech at the 2008 Democratic
Convention, the reader learns, made use of "tricolon," "polysyndeton,"
and "praeteritio," among many others.
Glover points out that the
mood and beliefs of the audience are just as important as the skill of the
speaker—as Brutus learned to his cost when he failed to win over the Roman
public after the murder of Julius Caesar. And he insists that oratory can't
finally change the way the public thinks about a speaker. While he regards
Sarah Palin as a masterful orator, he concludes that her vice-presidential
nomination speech, for all its "brilliant empathetic appeal," could
not give her "the two things she couldn't project: experience and
gravitas."
Glover never quite comes
to terms with the fact that oratory can be used for evil just as easily as for
good (Hitler, of course, was a brilliant orator.) Conversely, goodness is
sometimes tongue-tied: Socrates refused to beg for the jury's sympathy at his
own trial, and ended up getting the death penalty. Glover's comment on this is
comically condescending: "Anyone who has worked in politics for any length
of time would have come across people like Socrates, who manage to combine a
bleak view of their fellow men with rather unworldly idealism. The history
books warm to them, but in a practical way they tend to achieve little except
martyrdom…." But who has a bleaker view of mankind—Socrates, who spoke the
truth plainly and expected his judges to listen, or Glover, who thinks men are
deaf to truth unless it has a good speechwriter?
Footnotes:

The question of why women are underrepresented in the so-called STEM fields—science, technology, engineering, and mathematics—continues to be hotly debated. In
Toys and Tools in Pink: Cultural Narratives of Gender, Science, and Technology
(Ohio State University Press), Carol Colatrella joins the discussion by examining the way women scientists are portrayed in American popular culture, film, and television.

The Age of Anxiety, originally published in 1947, is one of W. H. Auden's most ambitious poems—a dialogue among four people in a New York bar that analyzes the spiritual condition of the West after the Second World War. Now the first critical edition of the poem, edited by Alan Jacobs (Princeton), helps to elucidate Auden's work with an introduction and extensive notes.

William Clark is remembered as Meriwether Lewis's partner in the expedition that mapped the American continent. In
William Clark's World: Describing America in an Age of Unknowns (Yale), Peter J. Kastor explores the whole of Clark's career, showing how his work as a writer and mapmaker influenced the way Americans came to imagine a continent they had never seen.
Please sign in to add a comment on this article.