"Shostakovich hated being asked questions about his music and
whether this or that theme represented something or had any particular
meaning," a friend of the great Soviet composer once said. "When
asked, 'What did you want to say in this work?' he would answer, 'I've said
what I've said.'" It is rather daring for Wendy Lesser to quote this
austere refusal in Music for Silenced
Voices: Shostakovich and his Fifteen Quartets, her
thoughtful and appealing new book. After all, Lesser's whole premise is that
the music Dmitri Shostakovich wrote ought to heard as an expression of his life
and times, and a commentary on them. In particular, his string quartets
"offer unparalleled access to the composer's inner life," Lesser
writes; and her critical method is to braid together episodes from
Shostakovich's biography with the intuitions about his experience that she
gains through her listening. "There is a desire to connect the human being
who once lived to the still-living music, which seems to have a human voice
behind it."
This kind of double deduction, from the man to
the music and back again, is especially tempting in the case of Shostakovich,
who spent his entire adult life under Soviet dictatorship, and was forced to
make use of silence, irony, and indirection in order to survive. Lesser
recounts the now-legendary stories of his persecution. In 1936, and again in
1948, Stalin's cultural commissars denounced Shostakovich's music for its
"formalist distortions and anti-democratic tendencies," effectively
prohibiting its performance. The price of continuing to live and work was
ritual submission, and Shostakovich made statements supporting the Communist
regime both in print and in his music. Eventually, humiliatingly, he joined the
Party.
Yet it is also easy to
hear how his music, with its nervous intensity and sardonic gloom, tells the
bitter truth about his time and place. Lesser helps us hear that confession,
thanks to her sympathetic, non-technical accounts of what it is like to listen
to Shostakovich's quartets. Here is Lesser on the Fifth Quartet, written in
1952, the year before Stalin's death:
If the music of the
Fifth Quartet is highly abstract, in the manner of a Bach fugue . . . the
feelings it conveys are nonetheless intense. The repetitions are both obsessive
and probing, not reassuring, as they are in Bach; and those nearly undetectable
background chords create an eerie, almost frightening sensation of extreme
depth beneath the etched surface . . . . That particular sense of dread—that
waiting for the knock on the door in the middle of the night, or for the
arbitrary committee decision that will bury a life's work, or for the next
public demand that will require painful self-abasement and induce extreme
self-disgust—is what . . . performers hear in the quartets, and perhaps
especially in the Fifth Quartet.
This is not music criticism the way musicologists
write it, obviously, and there are moments when Lesser's literary and
metaphorical approach to Shostakovich seems to overreach. (For instance, she
surmises that he turned to the string quartet form because it represented an
"Athenian democracy" of equals, as opposed to the orchestra with its
conductor, "a figure altogether too much in the Stalin mode.") But
the kind of license Lesser takes with this music is the kind we all take with
the music we love, out of which we create our own myths and meanings. Her
commitment to Shostakovich is so intense that she achieves what every critic
must hope for: Lesser sends us straight back to the quartets, to see if we can
hear what she hears.
Footnotes:

Atlanta's place in the Civil Rights Movement is inevitably connected with Martin Luther King, Jr., who was born there and served as pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church. But as Tomiko Brown-Nagin shows in Courage to Dissent: Atlanta and the Long History of the Civil Rights Movement (Oxford), there is much more to the city's story. Her book explores the whole range of lesser-known local figures, court cases, and protests that changed Atlanta's racial culture from the 1950s through the 1970s.

Ever wonder what it's like to be a turtle? No one has come closer to finding out than Donald C. Jackson in Life in a Shell: A Physiologist's View of a Turtle (Harvard), as he delves into the biology and behavior that has allowed the turtle to survive on Earth essentially unchanged for the last 220 million years.
Please sign in to add a comment on this article.