Lincoln & The Court

Few presidents in U.S. history have pushed the limits of executive power, especially in the realm of national security, as far as has George W. Bush. But if President Bush has been criticized for using the crisis of war as a pretext for an unconstitutional "power grab," another president was equally subject to such criticisms: Abraham Lincoln.

War has always required an enhanced role for the commander-in-chief. Decisions must often be made quickly, and in secrecy, to match the urgency of fast-moving national emergencies. Yet unlike that of the ancient Romans, our system of government is not suspended in wartime, nor are dictatorial powers granted. Power is -- theoretically -- shared among the executive, the Congress and the courts. In practice, however, U.S. presidents are given wide latitude in wartime to protect the nation, and oversight becomes, as recent events have demonstrated, problematic.

Lincoln was by many accounts the greatest wartime president in U.S. history. Now legal historian Brian McGinty lucidly explores how Lincoln exercised his constitutional powers to meet the national crisis, and reviews how the Supreme Court interpreted the legality of Lincoln's wartime measures. Lincoln & The Court clearly illuminates the challenges of judicial oversight in wartime.

Decisions of the Supreme Court may be difficult to enforce while war rages, notes McGinty, especially when they contradict a wartime leader's policies. Back in 1814, a federal judge in New Orleans ruled against General Andrew Jackson's suspension of habeas corpus rights. General Jackson not only ignored the judge's ruling but had the judge thrown in jail. When a federal district attorney demanded that the imprisoned judge be released, Jackson tossed the D.A. in jail, too.

Lincoln, like Jackson, heard himself called a dictator more than once. Lincoln's constitutional "war powers" were tested before the Supreme Court several times, and McGinty meticulously not only describes these legal rulings but relates the factual background of each case, while painting detailed portraits of the Supreme Court justices who examined Lincoln's actions. The towering judicial figure of the era, who passionately opposed Lincoln, was Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney.

Taney had grown up on a Maryland plantation that had slaves, and he was pro-slavery. Taney's infamous decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, issued in 1857, attempted to resolve the constitutional questions surrounding slavery but only served to exacerbate them. Taney's decision declared all African-Americans "so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." Moreover, Taney held that slaveowners had constitutionally protected property rights in their slaves, which were enforceable wherever the slaves might be.

This leads to McGinty's description of how Lincoln, as a brilliant young lawyer and politician, staked his political future on a passionate opposition to Taney and the Dred Scott decision. When Lincoln ran against Senator Stephen Douglas in Illinois, Lincoln pointed out that Taney's decision made any political compromise over slavery impossible. Under Taney's logic, Lincoln declared, slavery went from being a Southern institution to a national institution. Although Lincoln lost to Douglas, he again assaulted Dred Scott during his 1860 run for the presidency. Lincoln's most forceful response to Dred Scott was during his famous Cooper Union speech, which proved to be a milestone on his path to victory.

When the Civil War broke out in the spring of 1861, Lincoln faced Roger Taney again. After rioting broke out in deeply divided Baltimore, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and authorized his generals to make arrests and hold suspected rebels without charges. John Merryman was arrested by Union military authorities on suspicion of sabotaging railroads. Merryman's lawyer went to the federal circuit court in Baltimore seeking a writ of habeas corpus, and the request was received by Taney. He issued the writ demanding that Merryman be released and brought before a civilian court.

Taney's action began a tense standoff between the commander-in-chief and the federal courts. When Taney's writ was delivered to Fort McHenry, where Merryman was jailed, the commanding general refused it, citing President Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus. Taney was livid and blasted Lincoln in Ex Parte Merryman. Taney's decision "was emphatic in concluding that the president...had no power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus," and asserted that only Congress could do so, writes McGinty. Lincoln refused to obey Taney's decision, asserting his sworn obligation to defend the nation: "re all the laws, but one, to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces, lest that one be...





April 19: "What you see first, after the starting gun's crack, is a column of bobbing runners, thousands of them, surging downhill..."

Donna Tartt's The Goldfinch is the winner of the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. James Parker calls this Dickensian coming-of-age novel "an enveloping…

advertisement
Books, CDs, DVDs to know about now
Poems That Make Grown Men Cry

And women too.  Luminaries from Colin Firth to Nick Cave and Jonathan Franzen chose the poems that bring them to tears, and the result is a stunning collection of poignant verse from writers like Auden, Whitman, Bishop, Larkin, Neruda and many others.  Warning: choking-up hazard.

The King of Pain

Trapped beneath his entertainment system, reality TV mastermind Rick Salter reflects on his life and tries to piece together the events of the previous evening. Seth Kaufman’s romp is an outrageous meditation on pain and entertainment in a deranged world in which the two are often interchangeable.

The Good Inn

Frank Black, frontman for the Pixies, has written a transgressive historical fiction with shades of Thomas Pynchon (focused as it is on the history of explosives and cinematic pornography), all set in a hallucinatory Edwardian Europe.