If dirt, as William James put it, is matter out of place, then the
dirtiest dirt of all is the kind you put where you're absolutely not supposed
to: in your mouth. We teach children not to eat dirt even before they can talk;
conversely, telling someone to eat dirt is a powerful expression of contempt, a
way of demoting them from human to animal. Yet as Sera L. Young explains in her
quirkily informative book Craving Earth:
Understanding Pica, eating dirt—in particular, certain kinds of dry,
crumbly clay, as well as other non-food substances like uncooked starch, chalk,
and ice—is a very widespread human practice, and always has been. Pica, as this behavior is known—the
name comes from the Latin word for "magpie"—is especially common
among pregnant women.
This has been recognized since ancient times: Hippocrates, the
5th-century BC Greek physician, noted that pregnant women often had cravings
for earth or charcoal, and a classic Indian poem describes a pregnant queen who
"set her heart upon clay in preference to all other objects of taste."
Today, Young reports, Americans with pica buy boxes of chalk at Walmart, or
bags of ice (the cubes at the Sonic fast-food chain seem to be especially
popular), or even order prime Georgia dirt over the Internet.
Yet the stigma attached to eating dirt is so strong that few people
will readily admit to it. One of Young's most fascinating chapters, "Dismissal
and Damnation," shows that European scientists who observed pica among
African or Asian peoples described it as a degenerate vice. An Amazonian
explorer who noticed the practice among "the natives" cited it as
evidence that they "appear to be sunk in an abyss of moral filth and
depravity from which nothing but a strong tide of European immigration can save
them." Among the illustrations in Craving
Earth are chilling images of the iron masks that American slaveholders used
to prevent their slaves from eating dirt; in Jamaica, slaves alleged to have
died from pica had their corpses decapitated as a warning to others.
This stigma depends on the idea that pica is both
unnatural and unhealthy. But is it? That's the question Young, a medical
doctor, sets out to answer in Craving
Earth by reviewing the scientific literature on pica. Operating on the
assumption that a behavior could not be so widespread and apparently
instinctive unless it was adaptive in some way, Young considers two hypotheses.
The first is that pica is a way for people to get nutrients missing from their
diet, especially iron. This idea seems to be supported by the observed
correlation between dirt-eating and anemia: in fact, a Roman writer mentioned
the connection between "pale complexion" and "a morbid appetite
for earth" some 2,000 years ago.
Yet Young goes on to show that the correlation is ambiguous: adding
iron to the diet of a person with pica does not seem to eliminate her cravings,
nor does eating earth seem to add iron to the blood. On the contrary, one study
shows that eating dirt reduces the body's ability to absorb iron, raising the
possibility that pica actually causes anemia, instead of curing it.
More plausible, though still not definitively proven, is the idea that
dirt-eating helps to protect the body from toxins and pathogens. Clay, Young
explains, is a perfect natural filter, binding poisons and bacteria to its
porous surface; indeed, clay is commonly used in water filters like Brita, and
in many anti-diarrhea medicines. (Kaopectate is named after kaolin, a kind of
clay that used to be its active ingredient.) It is suggestive, then, that most
people who engage in geophagy—from the Greek for "dirt eating"—prefer
clayey soils. What's more, the populations that seem most prone to pica—pregnant
women and people in tropical regions—are also the most vulnerable to poisons
and parasites. Without more study, Young concludes, we can't yet say exactly
what pica means or what harm it may do. In the meantime, Craving Earth offers the best account we have of this oddly
fascinating subject.
Footnotes:

There's something simultaneously wonderful and a little creepy about Google. An indispensable tool, it is also a powerful, self-interested corporation that now controls much of the world's information—a potential free-market Big Brother. In The Googlization of Everything (And Why We Should Worry) (California), Siva Vaidhyanathan sounds the warning bell about Google's power, and proposes a more democratic way to organize our knowledge.

In
Adam's Gift: A Memoir of a Pastor's Calling to Defy the Church's Persecution of Lesbians and Gays (Duke), former Methodist minister Jimmy Creech tells the story of how an encounter with a gay parishioner, Adam, led him to start questioning his conservative denomination's views on homosexuality. After years of soul-searching and Bible-reading, Creech came to the conclusion that homosexuality is not a sin, and began to officiate at same-sex weddings—leading him to be stripped of his office by the United Methodist Church.

Jim Kristofic has an unusual perspective on Native American life. Born in Pittsburgh to a white family, he moved at the age of seven to a Navajo reservation in Arizona, carried along by his mother's fascination with the tribe. In his memoir Navajos Wear Nikes: A Reservation Life (University of New Mexico), Kristofic writes about the culture shock he experienced, the natural beauty of the reservation, and how he learned to negotiate between two worlds.
Please sign in to add a comment on this article.