Bernhard Schlink is known as the author of elegant philosophical novels that examine
facets of his native Germany's troubled history. But he is also a lawyer, has
served as a judge, and frequently teaches classes in the philosophy of law in
both Germany and the United States. Schlink particularly enjoys his work on the
bench: "What I've loved," he has said, "is using all my
theoretical, doctrinal, philosophical and historical knowledge, for the
solution of a problem."
These are exactly the
skills he brings to his fiction. The son of a theologian, Schlink was brought
up to look at life as a series of moral problems. Historical events encouraged
this natural propensity. At the time of the author's birth in 1944, German
armies were facing imminent defeat across Europe, and the Nazi regime was
self-destructing at home. Schlink's childhood was passed in the postwar miasma
of guilt, horror, and recrimination: his 1995 novel The Reader, which has now become required reading in German
schools, must surely stem from his memories of that period. The reuinification
of Germany two decades ago reawakened many ghosts, as his book Homecoming (2006) demonstrates. And now Schlink has directed
his attention to the 1970s, a time when many of his contemporaries turned to
extreme leftist politics, and a radical few to terrorism.
The Weekend examines the moral legacy of that era, when the
so-called Red Army Faction (better known outside of Germany as the
Baader-Meinhof Group) killed a total of thirty-four people and in 1977 brought
the country to a high pitch of fear. Jörg, The
Weekend's central character, is supposed to have been associated with this
group; he was eventually convicted on four counts of murder and consigned to
prison, where he stayed for twenty-four years. As the story begins, Jörg, now
in late middle age, has been released on a presidential pardon. This pardon is
supposed to symbolize reconciliation, the closing of the door on that particular
national trauma.
Jörg's sister Christiane
has organized a weekend party to welcome him back to freedom. The guests, most
of whom haven't seen each other since their student days, assemble obediently
at Christiane's dilapidated manor house in the depths of the Brandenburg
countryside. They have all left their radical pasts far behind. Karin has
become a bishop in the Lutheran church. Ulrich owns and runs dental
laboratories. Ilse, for many years a schoolteacher, has begun to write fiction.
Andreas, the terrorists' lawyer, now represents more conventional clients. They
all have a hard time understanding their youthful convictions, suspecting that
even at the time their motivations were less than pure. Only Jörg appears
unrepentant, ready if necessary to resume the armed struggle.
But how much of his
apparent resolve is real and how much is due to mere vanity? This is what the
others wonder as they watch Jörg preen in the adoring gaze of a young acolyte,
Marko. Or is he simply stupid, ethically and intellectually incapable of
feeling remorse for the four innocent lives he took? After all, it's not as if "the
people's liberation struggle against imperialism and colonialism" put the
slightest check on the actual progress of imperialism and colonialism. It was a
futile effort whose futility lives on in Marko's idiotic rhetoric:
If we
joined with our Muslim comrades we could really get things going. They with
their power and we with what we know about this country—together we could
really strike where it hurts….You probably think September Eleventh was just
some crazy Muslim affair. No, without September Eleventh none of the good
things that have happened over the past few years would have happened. The new
attentiveness to the Palestinians, still the key to peace in the Middle East,
and to the Muslims, still a quarter of the world's population, the new
sensitivity to the threats in the world, from the economic to the ecological,
the realization that exploitation has a price that is always rising—sometimes
the world needs a shock to come to its senses.
Christiane's friend
Margarete, new to the group, sees the "liberation struggle" in terms
of pathology. "Listening to Christiane and her friends talk about the RAF
and Germany's autumn of terror and the pardoning of terrorists, time and again
Margarete had the sense of something sick, a subject in which people were
talking about a sickness that had afflicted the terrorists back then and was
now afflicting the speakers." Ilse, the most introverted member of the
group, tries to work out its history through fiction. Traumatized by the sight
of victims jumping from the burning World Trade Center, she writes a story in
which an imagined RAF terrorist loses his own life in the Trade Center decades
later.
It is left to Jörg's son
Ferdinand, two years old at the time of his father's arrest and now an adult,
to make the inevitable link between the ethos of Jörg's generation and that of
the reviled Nazis, their parents.
In the
little town where I grew up, I would play cards in the pub with my friends
every few weeks. One evening I learned that the five old men at the locals'
table had all been in the SS. I sat down at the next table and pricked up my
ears. Remember the time, remember the time—it was like that all evening. Don't
you remember the time we beat up the Jews in Wilna and shot the Poles in
Warsaw, obviously, but: remember the time we drank champagne in Warsaw and
fucked the Polish girls in Wilna. And remember the time the barber shaved the
old men with the long beards, ha-ha? You're exactly the same. What about:
remember the time you shot that woman during the bank robbery? Or the policeman
at the border? Or the head of the bank? Or the association president?
Was the decision by the
1970s generation, then, to make a virtue of random violence an earnest reaction
against the evil committed by their fathers a generation earlier? Or does it
represent a curse passed from father to son, one that might only be exorcised
from history with extreme difficulty?
There is no doubt where
Schlink's own sympathies lie: he has devoted his life to the law, after all,
and as one might expect, the unrepentant terrorist Jörg is a thoroughly
repulsive character. Germany's "autumn of terror" might seem very
distant now, but it continues to haunt Schlink's generation, with reason. Uli
Edel's 2008 film The Baader-Meinhof
Complex, a beautifully produced recreation of the gang and
its deeds, failed in its central mission, which should have been to help us
understand the real motivations behind the terrorists' formulaic rhetoric. Schlink
doesn't entirely succeed here either, and perhaps there is no way that those of
us not infected by what Margarete deems a "sickness" can ever really
make sense of the violent and irrational ideology. But its toxic residue
continues to poison German waters. Just this month a fifty-eight-year-old
former Red Army Faction member, Verena Becker, has gone on trial for the
shooting deaths of West Germany's top prosecutor and two others in 1977. Discussions
like those around Christiane's dinner table are no doubt taking place all over
Germany today.
Please sign in to add a comment on this article.