Paul Simon's observation that
"Every generation throws a hero up the pop charts" seems somehow applicable to
the whole concept of canonical SF anthologies, of which the latest is The
Wesleyan Anthology of Science Fiction,
assembled jointly by six savants who represent the editorial board of the
prestigious journal Science Fiction Studies. Every decade
or two the field senses a need to redefine its history, both to itself and to
outsiders, the latter of whom might wish to employ the resultant volume as a map
of strange territories useful in a classroom environment. But generalist readers also benefit from a
fresh look at the classic tales, along with unearthed, obscure yet
representative gems.
The last such major
undertaking was The Norton Book of Science Fiction, compiled a generation ago in 1993 by Ursula K. Le Guin
and Brian Attebery. The amplified
scholarship of the past seventeen years, plus a different approach, methodology
and remit on the part of the current editors, have resulted in a volume that
barely overlaps its predecessor. And
while the Norton has the greater
number of stories, the Wesleyan feels more comprehensive and definitive, insofar
as it reaches all the way back to the birth of SF (choosing Hawthorne's
"Rappacinni's Daughter" as illustrative of these origins), rather than starting
at 1960, as did the Norton. Also, the sieve-like group-mind approach to
story selection in the Wesleyan
avoids some of the more capricious and problematical choices made by Le Guin and
Attebery. Even lacking first-hand
acquaintance with her work, I'm sure Diane Glancy is a fine writer. But her story in the
Norton, "Aunt Parnetta’s Electric
Blisters," has hardly become a polestar to steer by.
To the contrary, the
selections in the Wesleyan, even the
possibly debatable twenty-first-century ones, constitute a flexible, inarguably essential vertebrae
of the patchwork Frankensteinian creature that is SF, off which can be hung
multiple organs and limbs. One gets the
sense that if all other SF were somehow destroyed in an apocalypse, the field
could be reconstituted from the seed vault of texts herein. The scintillant introductions to each piece,
full of cross-references and context, form a mini-history of the genre as
well. This book resembles a time-lapse
film of SF's growth, a century-and-a-half of metamorphosis and evolution
compacted into one beautiful fastforward montage.
Re-reading these seminal
stories in their new matrix, I discover things I had forgotten or never
knew. For instance: I recalled everything about Fritz Leiber's
brilliant "Coming Attraction"—except that it was told in the first-person. Recognition of the author's choice of voice
suddenly links it to other subjectively immersive dystopian works like A
Clockwork Orange. Epiphanies such as this
abound.
Without falling into a
teleological fallacy, this volume nonetheless magnificently charts some kind of
blindly urgent Darwinian evolution of the genre to more and more sophisticated
states. It captures, for the present and
near-term future anyhow, as vivid and crystalline a portrait of SF as
possible.
--PAUL DI FILIPPO

Paul Di Filippo's column The Speculator
appears monthly in the Barnes & Noble Review. He is the
author of several acclaimed novels and story collections, including
Fractal Paisleys, Little Doors, Neutrino Drag, and Fuzzy Dice.
Please sign in to add a comment on this article.